Periodic Trends: The Electronegativity Trend and Map

The electronegativity trend in actual numbers, a colour map of all 118 elements by electronegativity, ionization energy or electron affinity, and what each trend does and why.

Written and reviewed by the PrepOK team Last reviewed How we check these lessons

Color by:

General trend for Electronegativity: increases across a period (left → right) and decreases down a group (↓).

Low EN (Pauling)High EN
0.791.592.383.183.98

Scaled across the 100 elements that have a measured value. Grey cells have no value in the dataset and are left blank; no number is invented.

Hover or focus an element to see its electronegativity, then click any element to open its full page.

Showing Electronegativity.

The electronegativity trend

Electronegativity increases from left to right across a period, and decreases going down a group. Fluorine is the most electronegative element at 3.98 on the Pauling scale; caesium and francium are the least, both at 0.79.

Electronegativity is how strongly an atom pulls on the electrons it is sharing in a bond. Switch the map above to electronegativity and the gradient is obvious: bright at the top right, dark at the bottom left. Here are the same four walks as numbers.

Electronegativity in Pauling along two periods and two groups, with what the values do along each walk.
Walk Electronegativity (Pauling) What it does
Across period 2 Li 0.98 → Be 1.57 → B 2.04 → C 2.55 → N 3.04 → O 3.44 → F 3.98 increases at every step
Across period 3 Na 0.93 → Mg 1.31 → Al 1.61 → Si 1.9 → P 2.19 → S 2.58 → Cl 3.16 increases at every step
Down group 1, lithium to francium Li 0.98 → Na 0.93 → K 0.82 → Rb 0.82 → Cs 0.79 → Fr 0.79 decreases (with a tie)
Down group 17, the halogens F 3.98 → Cl 3.16 → Br 2.96 → I 2.66 → At 2.2 decreases at every step

Both directions have one cause. Going right along a period, each element gains a proton but its outer electrons stay in the same shell, at about the same distance, so the pull gets stronger. Going down a group, each step adds a whole shell, pushing the outer electrons further out and screening them behind the filled shells underneath, so the pull weakens.

Notice that going down group 1 is not a perfectly clean slide: potassium and rubidium are both quoted at 0.82. And hydrogen, which sits at the top of group 1, is left out of that walk on purpose. It has one outer electron like the alkali metals but it is a nonmetal, and at 2.2 it is more electronegative than any element below it.

Electronegativity differences are what make a bond polar, which is where this trend earns its keep.

The four periodic trends, what each one does across a period and down a group, and why.
Property Across a period (left to right) Down a group Why
Atomic radius (no data on the map) decreases increases More protons pull the same shell inward. Each new period adds a whole shell.
First ionization energy increases, with dips decreases A smaller atom holds its outer electron closer to more protons, so it costs more to remove.
Electron affinity rises to a peak at the halogen, then collapses at the noble gas decreases, roughly An almost-full shell wants one more electron. A full one has nowhere to put it.
Electronegativity increases decreases Same cause as ionization energy: more protons, smaller atom, tighter grip on shared electrons.

Atomic radius is the one to hold on to, because it explains the other three. A smaller atom holds its outer electrons closer to more protons, so it takes more energy to remove one (ionization energy), it grips shared electrons harder (electronegativity), and it usually accepts a new one more readily (electron affinity). Everything else is a consequence.

Electronegativity or ionization energy?

These two get mixed up constantly, and the reason is that they move together: both rise across a period and fall down a group. But they answer different questions.

So an isolated fluorine atom has an ionization energy (1681 kJ/mol) but no meaningful electronegativity until you bond it to something. They track each other because both come down to the same two things, nuclear charge and atomic size, not because they measure the same thing.

First ionization energy

First ionization energy is the energy needed to remove the outermost electron from a neutral gas-phase atom, in kJ/mol. It increases across a period and decreases down a group, for the same reasons as electronegativity. Helium is the highest of any element at 2372 kJ/mol.

First ionization energy in kJ/mol along two periods and two groups, with what the values do along each walk.
Walk First ionization energy (kJ/mol) What it does
Across period 2 Li 520 → Be 900 → B 801 → C 1087 → N 1402 → O 1314 → F 1681 → Ne 2081 increases overall, dipping at B and O
Across period 3 Na 496 → Mg 738 → Al 578 → Si 787 → P 1012 → S 1000 → Cl 1251 → Ar 1521 increases overall, dipping at Al and S
Down group 1, lithium to francium Li 520 → Na 496 → K 419 → Rb 403 → Cs 376 → Fr 380 decreases overall, rising at Fr
Down group 17, the halogens F 1681 → Cl 1251 → Br 1140 → I 1008 → At 899 decreases at every step

The dips are the interesting part, and they are not noise. Across period 2 the value falls at boron and again at oxygen; across period 3 it falls at aluminium and sulfur. Both are the same two effects repeating:

Group 1 metals are lowest in their rows because losing one electron leaves them looking like a noble gas, which is exactly what makes them so reactive. Going down that group the values fall as expected until the very last step, where francium comes out slightly above caesium. That is not a typo in the data: in an atom that heavy the innermost electrons move fast enough for relativity to matter, which contracts the outer 7s orbital and pulls its electron in a little tighter.

Electron affinity

Electron affinity is the energy change when a gas-phase atom gains an electron (kJ/mol, where a larger positive number means more energy released, so the atom “wants” the electron).

The usual one-line version, “it increases across a period”, is worth being careful with. What actually happens is that it climbs to a peak at the halogen and then collapses at the noble gas. Across period 2 it runs from lithium at 60 up to fluorine at 328, then drops to −116 at neon, which has a full shell and nowhere to put another electron. It also dips at group 2 and group 15, mirroring the ionization-energy dips for the same subshell reasons.

There is one famous anomaly worth knowing: chlorine (349 kJ/mol) has a higher electron affinity than fluorine (328). Fluorine’s 2p shell is so small that an incoming electron meets real crowding, and the repulsion cancels part of the energy released. It is the standard exam example of a trend having a good reason to break.

Atomic radius

Atomic radius is the trend that explains the others, and it is the one the map cannot colour: our element dataset carries no radii, so rather than guess at 118 numbers the map leaves it out.

The behaviour is the mirror image of the rest. Radius decreases across a period, because the growing nuclear charge pulls the same shell inward, and increases down a group, because each period adds a shell. Two anchors worth memorising: across period 2, lithium is much larger than fluorine; down group 1, caesium is far larger than lithium.

Element properties repeat predictably as you move across a period (a row) or down a group (a column). That repetition is the whole point of the periodic table, and it is why the table is shaped the way it is rather than being a list.

The heat-map above colours every element by one measurable property at a time, shaded against the real minimum and maximum for that property. Elements with no measured value stay grey and are never guessed.

Using this with a class

Project the map, switch properties, and have students predict the next colour before you reveal it. A good follow-up once they have the trend: ask them to find the dips in ionization energy across period 2 and explain them, which forces the jump from “the trend goes up” to “here is what the electrons are doing”. Tie it to the Bohr model for the full atomic picture. It is free to embed on your own site or LMS using the snippet below.

Frequently asked questions

What is the trend for electronegativity?
Electronegativity increases from left to right across a period and decreases going down a group. Fluorine is the most electronegative element at 3.98 on the Pauling scale; caesium and francium are the least at 0.79. Both directions have the same cause: an atom with more protons and a smaller radius pulls harder on shared electrons.
Why does electronegativity increase across a period?
Going right along a row, each element has one more proton but its outer electrons are going into the same shell, at roughly the same distance from the nucleus. More positive charge pulling on electrons that have not moved further away means a stronger pull, so the atom competes harder for the electrons in a bond.
Why does electronegativity decrease down a group?
Each step down adds a whole electron shell, so the outer electrons sit further from the nucleus and are screened from it by the filled shells in between. The extra protons are outweighed by the extra distance and shielding, so the pull on a shared pair weakens: from fluorine at 3.98 down to iodine at 2.66.
What is the difference between electronegativity and ionization energy?
Electronegativity measures how hard an atom pulls on electrons it is sharing in a bond; it is a relative scale with no units. Ionization energy measures how much energy it takes to remove an electron the atom already owns, and it is a real measured quantity in kJ/mol. They follow the same direction across the table because both come down to nuclear charge and atomic size, but they answer different questions: one is about electrons in a bond, the other about electrons being taken away entirely.
Which element is the most electronegative?
Fluorine, at 3.98 on the Pauling scale. It is small, so its outer shell sits close to the nucleus, and it has nine protons pulling on it. The least electronegative elements are caesium and francium, both quoted at 0.79.
What are the four periodic trends?
Atomic radius, first ionization energy, electron affinity and electronegativity. Radius decreases across a period and increases down a group; the other three broadly do the opposite, because they all depend on how tightly the nucleus holds the outer electrons. Radius is the one that explains the others.
Does electron affinity increase across a period?
Only up to a point, and the usual one-line version of the trend is misleading. Electron affinity climbs to a peak at the halogen, then collapses at the noble gas, which has no room for another electron: across period 2 it runs from lithium at 60 kJ/mol up to fluorine at 328, then falls to -116 at neon. It also dips at group 2 and group 15, where the subshell is full or exactly half full.
Why is chlorine's electron affinity higher than fluorine's?
Because fluorine is so small. The incoming electron has to join a tiny, already crowded 2p shell, and the repulsion it meets there cancels part of the energy released. Chlorine's 3p shell is roomier, so it takes an electron slightly more readily: 349 kJ/mol against fluorine's 328.

Sources

The figures in this interactive are computed from unit-tested code and the sources above, not typed in by hand. See how we build and check these lessons, and tell us at support@prepok.com if you spot an error.

Embed this on your site

Free to use. Paste this anywhere; a link back to PrepOK is included.

Related